2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Fiat | Reliant |
Model | Stilo | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |