2006 Ford Explorer vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Ford Explorer. (292 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Explorer.
Because 2006 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Explorer (407 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Z. (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Explorer | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Explorer | Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 72 L |