2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,358 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | GMC | Tata |
Model | Sierra | Nano |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5358 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 37 L |