2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1996 Renault Twingo
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Twingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Twingo would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 307 more horse power than 1996 Renault Twingo. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Twingo.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Twingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Twingo. (91 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Twingo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 1996 Renault Twingo | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Commodore | Twingo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 91 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |