2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 233 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | RX-8 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |