2006 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. (207 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan Armada | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Nissan | Saab |
| Model | Armada | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2675 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 62 L |
