2007 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP) has 416 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500. 2007 Cadillac STS-V has automatic transmission and 1969 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1969 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac STS-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac STS-V | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | STS-V | 1500 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 595 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2430 mm |