2007 Cadillac STS vs. 1996 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VII.
Because 2007 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac STS | 1996 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | STS | MK VII |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2040 mm |
