2007 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Holden UTE

To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 213 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. (144 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu.

Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. (206 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. 2007 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: