2008 Audi A3 vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2008 Audi A3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi A3 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi A3 (200 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi A3 | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | A3 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |
