2008 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 611 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Rezzo | 102 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |