2008 Fiat Croma vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Croma weights approximately 412 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Fiat Croma | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Croma | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2008 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1910 mm |