2008 MG TF vs. 2005 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2008 MG TF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG TF weights approximately 390 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2008 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2008 MG TF has manual transmission. 2008 MG TF will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 MG TF | 2005 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | TF | eK |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2350 mm |