2009 Alfa Romeo Brera vs. 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera weights approximately 195 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera | 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Brera | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2387 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2750 mm |
