2009 Audi S6 vs. 1967 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2009 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S6 | 1967 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S6 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 82 L |