2009 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 193 kg more than 2009 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (401 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | M3 | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 252 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |