2009 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 135 kg more than 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac Escalade. (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac Escalade | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
Make | Cadillac | Lamborghini |
Model | Escalade | Gallardo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 332 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 498 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4345 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1165 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.4 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 18.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 90 L |