2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 865 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Epica | Minica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2350 mm |