2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1967 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 821 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1967 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
| Model | Rezzo | 2CV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 25 L |
