2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Aspen would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 834 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (447 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Aspen | Phantom |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2649 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5842 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1638 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3570 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 100 L |