2009 Ford Fusion vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. Both 2009 Ford Fusion and 2004 Mazda B3000 are equipped with a 2,966 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (221 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 544 kg more than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Fusion (278 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Fusion | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fusion | B3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 74 L |