2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1978 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1978 Opel Ascona.
Because 1978 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1978 Opel Ascona has manual transmission. 1978 Opel Ascona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1978 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 3 | Ascona |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2530 mm |