2009 Mazda 3 vs. 2002 Opel Concept M
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Concept M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Concept M would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 252 kg more than 2002 Opel Concept M.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Concept M (205 Nm @ 1980 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Concept M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 2002 Opel Concept M | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 3 | Concept M |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1980 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 52 L |