2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1974 Mini MK III
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1974 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1974 Mini MK III | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 6 | MK III |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 847 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |