2009 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda BT-50 | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | BT-50 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |
