2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2003 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Peugeot 307. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Peugeot 307 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2003 Peugeot 307. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2003 Peugeot 307. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 308 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Peugeot 307. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Peugeot 307. (184 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Peugeot 307.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2003 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | CX-9 | 307 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |