2009 Nissan Versa vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Nissan Versa is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Versa. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Versa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Versa weights approximately 12 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Versa. (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Versa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Nissan Versa | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Versa | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |
